Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Administration Music Publishing
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
- The Administration Music Publishing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:COMPANY due to a lack of reliably sourced content that would indicate notability. The top contributor looks to be COI account and the list of artists in the lead is obviously a hoax. Claims to have published music by 2Pac in the last year when he has been dead since 1996, among listing many other very notable recording artists that have known publishing deals with real corporations (Jay-Z, Eminem, Kanye West, Dr. Dre, Justin Bieber, Snoop Dogg, Maroon 5, 50 Cent, Chris Brown), that would not be a part of a company that was founded last year and supposedly has one single employee. STATic message me! 20:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
That publishing company does in fact publish songs released by those artists. It does not claim to publish Jay-Z or 2Pac directly. The clients listed below, and signed to the company, have written and/or produced songs that Jay Z, 2Pac, Eminem, etc have released. The company now publishes their shares of the songs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickvelo (talk • contribs) 20:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete It looks like they are just trying to promote their non notable company. Koala15 (talk) 00:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with above. The article relies on a single primary source (it's own site) and there are no reliable sources which indicate it's notable so it fails WP:COMPANY. 2Flows (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Completely non-notable. Even if they actually have published music by their long list of "clients" (or "their shares of the songs" whatever that means), it doesn't help the company's notability because of WP:NOTINHERIT. --MelanieN (talk) 17:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.